It seems like whenever I write a lengthy blogpost, the posts are motivated by a ‘slap myself in the forehead’ moment after reading a silly or stupid post written by someone else. I promise that in the future I will try to be positive and proactive and not negative and reactive. Okay, I won’t promise, but I will work on it. But until then….
Yesterday I read a silly and overly optimistic post on ZDnet’s, The ToyBox, written by Andrew Nusca, titled “Five Reasons Google Android smartphones will beat iPhone, Blackberry, WinMo.” All I can ask is, “Is he using the same Android phone as me?” As I said in a previous post, “My Take On Android’s First Year,” I like the Android, but it has a long way to go. Google has to get behind it and really market it, if it wants to catch up with the iPhone. In a response to Mr Nusca’s post, here are my Five Reasons Why the Android, May Not Beat the iPhone.
1. The Android Market stinks. (See My Take on Android First Year)
2. Android is improving slowly and when it does, no one knows it’s coming. Last week’s release of Donut Android 1.6 caught many people off guard. Plus there are rumors that the judging of ADC2 had to be wrapped early, because many of the apps entered into the challenge were broken by the new release. It’s a good thing this was just an app contest and not a challenge to put man on Mars.
3. The Android system may be an open OS, but as far as I can tell only boys interested in building Tower Defense games as apps are doing any serious work for the platform. I spent a good part of the last week using the ADC2 judging app on the phone and it was as exciting as watching paint dry. I taught Dreamweaver classes at Emerson College and got better looking stuff in the first week of class from Freshman.
4. Yeah, the Android will run on phones from several manufacturers. So we will have three or four companies, all trying to beat each other in the marketplace using different methods to out sell each other. Sounds like WinMo to me. That really worked.
5. The Android combines the best of what’s out there? All I can say is, Wiki the Tucker, Newton, DeLorean, 3DO, etc. just cuz it’s gooder don’t mean it’s a winner.
In summary, I have to say, once again, I love the Android phone, but Google has to get behind the system and market the hell out of this great phone concept.
An Open Letter to the Editor of the Connersville News-Examiner
January 17, 2010 in Commentary by admin | 1 comment
Dear Mr. Hufferd,
While I am sure you rely on the family members of the recently deceased to submit the copy and text for the obituaries in the News-Examiner, I would suggest that before obituaries appear in your online version, you or your staff might want to review and edit the copy.
In a recent obituary for the late Samuell David Barnes the first line reads, “Samuell David Barnes, 26, formally of Cambridge City, Ind., passed away on Jan. 13, 2010, at his home for the last three months in Connersville.” I assume the writer intended to use word “formerly” instead of the word “formally,” unless of course the decedent kept his formal resident in the great municipality of Cambrige City and was only a informal resident of the environs of Connersville.
Also from the structure of the sentence I am unsure if the late Mr. Burns was a three month resident of Connersville or if it took him three months to die in Connersville. I am sure this comes from the over use of commas as parentheticals and an error in logic in the statement. Of course if I am mistaken and the sentence should be read as written, I apologize. If that is the case however, I imagine the truth behind that statement will reduce the amount of upcoming casual emigres from Cambridge City.
Sincerely,
Mark Fish